antipattern

Not-so-nice thoughts on Silicon Valley

I live in bedroom community in Silicon Valley. It is quite lively but really not much happens here. Little crime, not much to report really.

My home owners association is probably much like the most. We try to keep things going but in in reality running the place is a bit of a burden, and most folks have too much going on to seriously pay attention to what needs to be done. Some folks do volunteer on the HOA and do get things done but slowly.

I have sporadic spurts of community spirit. Every now and then I have a movie night on our community lawn, where we get together and watch a fun movie we pick together. Some of my neighbors show up regularly, and we have a lot of fun. I show funny cartoons beforehand, sometimes we have a fire going with marshmallows and crackers and sometimes we dance a bit. Over the years I've been adding more fun activities, like corn hole games and a good sound system.

It is a lot of work and it takes a lot of time to prepare for the event and clean up afterwards.

But it is rewarding. I get neighbors asking me when the next movie night is going to be – its a lot of fun and I enjoy organizing it.

But even though we do make an effort to include all of our neighbors, we find that many people don't show up and participate. Everyone has their own life, and you can't expect too much. That's life I guess.

A recent event I organized for a 4th of July party was particularly badly attended. So I start wondering how to get more community folks involved.

Community starts somewhere. It is a feeling that is hard to pin down. How do you get people to attend?

Clearly just having a movie night was not enough. People don't really know and trust each other, so it was clearly a bit of optimistic thinking on our part.

The idea of a community library was suggested to me. You know those little bookshelves you sometimes see in well-to-do neighborhoods.

I thought it might be easiest to start with a simple implementation. A community book basket, just hanging from a tree with some books in it.

So I spent a 30 minutes creating one, with a small note with “the rules” – take a book and leave one – plus a few of my favorite books that I most likely won't read again. I added a note that maybe people could contribute some money to get a real book shelf made out of wood etc.

So what happened?

I can't believe it myself.

Literally within a few hours the whole book basket was STOLEN.

Gone. Less than three hours passed since I hung it up.

This was just a pretty nice basket with a bunch of books in it. Mostly on esoteric topics of philosophy and the climate crisis.

WTF? How do you explain that? Is my little community that fucked up?

It is a fucking book basket for Christ sake.

I can't explain it. It just boggles the mind.

What should I think of humanity?

Do you just give up?

What is wrong here?

If you've been following along, you know at least two things about me.

First, I ramble a lot about new entrepreneurship, idea engineering, and climate change and related not-so-nice-topics in Silicon Valley.

Second, I am looking for a new job. Preferably something that actually will make a difference.

All of this is somehow related to each other, at least in my mind.

Recently I have lots of time to think about these matters, partly because I am spending a lot of time in traffic and my mind wanders. There are lots of very interesting companies in San Francisco and the Peninsula, and I always seem to be in the wrong location.

So I move around all the time, like many of you.

My conclusion out of all of this commuting is that the majority of startups are absolutely pathetic when it comes to forcing moving people around.

You have to be in the office all week! Or you can work from home one day a week. The most progressive startup and I only found one so far, said I must work only Mondays and Wednesdays from the office (I think mainly because a very senior management person has commute issues herself).

For a supposedly bunch of forward thinking and innovative startups, this is totally stupid and backward.

Do you really need to have everyone in the same office? Do you know there are examples of successful tech companies where everyone is remote? Do you know video-conferencing actually works very well?

Do you know the extremely cost to the environment and our sanity on insisting people commuting?

Do you know that the new entrepreneur is supposed to think about this stuff for more than 5 secs ... ah, mmm, cough, no we all must work in the same office.

For collaboration reasons.

It is all just bullshit.

I am really looking forward to the day when the first venture capitalist says that they will only invest in companies that are 100% remote. Sure, some will snicker, but it will make me respect them and the companies they invest in.

Because they are taking a stand. And they think as the new entrepreneur should.

Getting a bit along in life, you are probably thinking about your retirement a lot. Either in a panic because you “don't have enough” or you are relishing getting out the rat race as soon as possible.

Either way, it is probably on your mind a lot.

So lets say you have 15 to 30 years to actual retirement. So you are talking about retiring in the time frame 2035 to 2050. About the time period of a typical house mortgage.

After retirement, let say you are healthy, and live another 30 years. So your might live until 2065 to 2080. If healthcare keeps improving as it does, you might make 2100, which just sounds marvelous. Or course, if you are younger today, you are very likely to live until then.

To put things in a bit of perspective, practically all of the technologies we use today did not exist before 1900. The financial system of today only really took off after the Second World War.

Your retirement depends on the financial and technology systems of today working efficiently and continue working with appropriate financial returns and technological innovations.

This is what all of us are counting on for a good life. Essentially the next hundred years being more of the same goodness.

Unfortunately, the chance of this happening is zero.

Zero.

The reason is that the period 1900 to 2100 will be the most tragic time for humanity. It will be two hundred years of extreme highs and lows.

Our carbon driven lifestyle essentially pumped massive amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere since 1900. We are talking 280 parts per million (PPM) to over 410 PPM CO2 in 2019.

We already know from geological studies that only a 100 PPM change in CO2 concentrations results in a sea-level change of over 70 feet. We also know that there has been massive extinction events related to CO2 concentrations. We also know that ice levels fluctuate dramatically based on C02 measures.

Typically the fluctuations in sea level normally take place over tens of thousands of years. This is simply because it takes a long time for all the ice to melt with small increases of C02.

What is remarkable is that since 1900, our addiction to fossil fuels has massively increased C02 levels at a rate that the planet has not seen in hundreds of millions of years.

And, so essentially, in the next hundred years, a huge amount of the ice will melt. There is not even a debate about it anymore. This is going to happen. It is happening. You can read about it, if you don't believe me.

In 2100 we are truly facing an unprecedented situation. Will we be prepared for this massive change in sea level?

So, what does this all mean?

Well, your precious retirement is totally screwed no matter what humanity does. It sounds pretty petty to put it in those personal terms, but that is probably the best way to get your attention. Because who normally cares about all of this stuff anyways?

You should. Because it is going to be very very bad.

Obviously a lot of people will need to be relocated either because of the sea level rising or extreme temperatures making parts of the globe uninhabitable.

We are talking about a massive number of climate refugees. Only in the US, it is expected to be 13 million people.

If you think you living on a mountain is going to solve your problems, think again. First of all, the mountain is going to be very full of people that have nothing. The mountain is going to be a very very depressing place. Your kids are going to hate you for what you did – not paying attention and leaving the world in a state that is just unimaginable.

Good luck finding a new mortgage or insurance. Trillions of real-estate and infrastructure will be destroyed, and a lot of people will suddenly be poor. Large parts of the planet will be empty. Ecosystems will collapse, animals will be dying, people will be starving.

This is not a theoretical conversation any more. If you live in Miami, your mortgage is already rated on your house elevation above sea-level. And typically we are talking about a few feet here, sometimes less that a foot having incredible implications on infrastructure. Because Miami is already sinking and flooding today.

All these changes coming (while you are waiting for your retirement) are hard to imagine. It is very hard to do, and easy to dismiss. Because the sun is still shining today, and you can't do much about it, right?

The situation is dire, and I am praying that a new type of person, a new type of entrepreneur will be forged in all of this chaos. A new entrepreneur, driven not by money, but by changing the behavior of people and humanity.

Because we really need those people right now to head off the worst that is to come.

I am hopeful that the new entrepreneur will make a difference, even if it is just to reduce the immense suffering that is yet to come.

It sounds a bit crazy I know, but a few people can actually make a big difference.

The most remarkable in recent times is an autistic 16-year old girl, who decided to make a stand. By simply striking from school on Fridays.

I am talking about Greta Thunberg who is inspiring school children all over the world, and whose climate crusade is now forcing the adults to pay attention. It is really a sad day for humanity if this is the most effective way for us to pay attention. It is a gut punch listening to her explaining how humanity is ignoring the most important issue of our times.

There will be more Gretas, more entrepreneurs standing up to be counted. They will think differently. They will think bigger. And we will be inspired by them. Because there is really no other choice for humanity. We need entrepreneurs that can change the behavior of humanity for the better.

If you are a new entrepreneur, now is your time to stand up. Even if it is just striking from work on Fridays.

Behavior change starts small.

With you.

Eat. Sleep. Work. Work. TV. Internet. Repeat.

You are probably stuck in that loop right now. Yeah, it is pretty depressing, but you are probably used to it by now and don't know a way out of your miserable little hole.

That's just life, right?

So let me punch you in the gut with new ideas and we will see how you feel afterwards.

So here are 3 books I would like to suggest for the New Entrepreneur:

These are important books and will change your thinking about a lot of things.

And it might just change your life. For the better, I hope.

Happy reading!

The earth has been sending humanity all sorts of warning signals for the last hundred years. The impact of our modern, heavily carbon-based capitalist economies has been leaving traces on earth for a really long time, but really few have been paying attention. Most folks are very far removed from nature, so you might not see first-hand the glaciers disappearing, the ocean ecosystems being massive disrupted, insect populations massively dying, and sea-level rise threatening the poorest and the richest nations of the world. And that is only a few things going massively wrong.

However, in the next two decades, in most of our lifetimes, the massive damage that humans inflicted on the planet will become painfully obvious to all. And most of us will enter a period of grief that humanity has never experienced before. Because even if we stop carbon dioxide emissions completely, a destructive process has been set in motion that is practically impossible to reverse at this time. And we will all wonder how we missed paying attention to such an important thing – our own survival.

Millions of years ago, when C02 levels in the atmosphere was as high as today, a massive extinction event destroyed 90% of life on earth.

Some will be able to say that they at least tried to change the course of things. Most will not be able to point to a single thing they did. In such a world, we will need new leaders to point the way. And as in most inflections points of the world, entrepreneurs have shown the way.

Today, an entrepreneur is essentially a machine to make money. If the future, an entrepreneur will be a person who changes the behavior of humanity, for the better. The existing definition of what an entrepreneur is has to change, and very quickly, from someone focused on money, towards humanity and changing behavior.

We are counting on entrepreneurs to solve the massive set of problems that humanity is facing now, and in the future.

It is a pretty sad state of affairs when even if you as an employee are looking to be employed in a company lead by the new entrepreneurs. They are very hard to find.

Where are the new entrepreneurs?

Idea Engineering is the art and science of developing an idea. It is the process an entrepreneur follows to develop an idea that can change the behavior of humans or humanity.

Today, idea engineering is primarily an art, and not much of a science, if at all. If it was more of a science, we would see much less failure in early stage ventures.

Ideas typically start out mediocre and programmed to fail. By iterating on the idea, the idea can be improved and strengthened, until it becomes something that will change the behavior of people. And just like therapy creates better humans, idea therapy creates better ideas.

A core principle of idea engineering and idea therapy is how to influence behavior via emotions.

No emotion. No change. No business.

The process is to identify things that people love, hate, or generally experience strongly either positively or negatively, and combine it with endeavors that either influence time or money.

Of course, entrepreneurs have been doing things like this implicitly for ages. You find a strong pain point and solve it. But the reality is that finding pain points in the hyper competitive world is not that easy any more – practically wherever you look, you will find solutions.

So as an entrepreneur you have to more clever in how to combine behavior changes and emotions together, in multiple layers, through a process called stacking. This creates a practically infinite catalog of ideas that can be individually explored. Some of the combinations will truly be innovative, and may develop into a healthy business. Exploring the combinations and changing the configuration of the idea is the idea therapy component of it.

Lets look at an example how stacking works. It is sort of like building a cake consisting of various layers that either involve emotions or behaviors.

Lets start with a layer of negative emotion. You have a long commute to work everyday, and you essentially have a lot of time on your hands. It is essentially unproductive time.

Lets stack another layer of negativity top of that. You are unhappy at work. So you are considering a new job, but you don't want to spend a lot of time on it. You are casually looking.

I suspect that lots of people fall in this category – in a later stage of idea engineering, this assumption will be validated.

OK, you are in your car, stuck in traffic, and thinking what to do about your unfulfilling job. This is a ripe time for inserting behavior change, because you are charged with negativity.

Lets stack another layer on top of this, namely the ability to make a phone call. For simplicity, lets say you are connected automatically to someone else, also in a car, and also looking for a job, and you can compare notes. And suppose the system does some matching. Note that we don't need to dive into the details here, since we are just exploring ideas. We might need to split this up into two or more layers itself. And there are definitely some technical considerations.

We just stacked three layers to create a unique idea. We will probably need more to make it all work.

The next layer could be to put the phone number on a billboard that is conveniently placed near a traffic hot spot.

We can experiment with other related ideas easily now. Car dating anyone? That just means swapping one of the layers.

Our ideas tend to flow more freely now. Suppose you are looking for a job, but you not in your car, but stuck doing something else mindless. Can you think of something? It is OK to swap out the layers to make the idea work. Often somethings are not compatible, but there is no harm in thinking of a new layer.

Using stacking, you can often generate a lot of ideas quickly. You still however need to evaluate the ideas individually.

I hope you have a great time coming with new ideas via stacking emotions and behaviors.

Good luck!

Where I live, entrepreneurship is a highly celebrated profession. A massive ecosystem exists supporting the profession. We have investors and employees swarming around successful entrepreneurs. We have reporters celebrating the success and failures entrepreneurs. And entrepreneurial success has brought both wealth and a host of social issues.

Welcome to Silicon Valley, the original home of the entrepreneur.

Even though we celebrate the entrepreneur, the actual creation of the successful entrepreneur is essentially a random process.

Entrepreneurs are really nobodies until they strike it big. It is a hero culture. One day you are nothing, and the next day you are a celebrity with all the benefits it provides. The road to become a successful entrepreneur could be instantaneous, or take a long time. Most never make the grade, with blogs and books filled with analysis of the high failure rate of entrepreneurship, the qualities of an entrepreneur, etc, etc.

Venture capitalists adopted this random process by heart very early on. They bet on many entrepreneurs, and hope some strike it big. It's intelligent gambling for a venture capitalist, and they extract a pound of flesh from entrepreneurs. Particularly the ones who fail, often destroying their passion, wealth and health in a grueling process of faking-until-you-make it – or more like not.

I am a big believer in the entrepreneur, even if the whole process is messy with a low probability of success. The reason is that we desperately need more entrepreneurs to dig humanity out of the moribund mess it has gotten itself into.

So it is important that we increase the probability of success for all entrepreneurs. Although the random process does work sometime, it does not work often enough.

So what can we do? I don't have all the answer myself, but maybe if we put more focus on the topic, we could perhaps make progress together.

So lets take a shot at it.

First, there are many things wrong with how people think about entrepreneurship, starting with what it actually is. The average person from the street will probably tell you an entrepreneur comes up with a great idea and makes a lot of money from it. Often there is mention of technology, apps, or more recently AI, robotics and the like.

This is a very limited definition, because it focuses on the entrepreneur and wealth, which does little to help humanity.

A much better way is to think of an entrepreneur as a person who changes the behavior of people. Or in the most successful outcome, the behavior of humanity.

This crisp definition is divorced from wealth, technology, company structure and the like, which makes it suitable for addressing larger scale issues that face the human race. It also makes it more suitable for analysis, as we will see.

The definition of an entrepreneur assumes there is an idea that is powerful enough to accomplish behavior change. With a proper and repeatable framework, you should think of developing this idea as an engineering process.

Lets call it idea engineering.

Ideally, if we want high probability of success, idea engineering should be a rigorous process. Of course, we are nowhere near a engineering process for ideas today. It is a wide open field for investigation and nobody really knows how to do it right.

With our new definition of entrepreneurship, we can start borrow approaches from other fields of study. There is a lot of work on behavior change, for example. What works and what does not.

For example, we know that educating a person often does not change their behavior. You might know that some animal is endangered, but you choose to do nothing about it.

What we do know is that emotions do affect behavior. Some will say this is the primary driver of behavior. If you don't feel something, typically nothing happens. Behavior is deeply ingrained in the human limbic system, responsible for emotion.

Since the world is full of humans, and there are too many of us, lets target changing the behavior of the average consumer. Of course, as an entrepreneur, you may choose to target other segments, such as business, which might be easier, but probably have less impact on a planetary scale.

Now of course, there are some stand-out examples of how human behavior has changed over the last hundred years. Television, the internet, the smart phone, Facebook, etc has fundamentally changed how people spend their time. With many examples of successful entrepreneurs behind them. Some may argue not always for the betterment of humanity.

So for business-to-consumer (B2C) endeavor, behavior change most often means changing normal people they spend their time. And there a very close link between time and emotion, which is the link the successful entrepreneur uses to change behavior.

It is possible to break behavior change into smaller manageable classes, which is convenient for separate analysis.

Lets take a more detailed look.

Time sink behavior change

A time sink, as you would expect, is something people spend time on. Major examples include working, watching TV, playing games, Instagram, shopping, and the like.

The most common emotion behind time sinks are love or boredom. People simple love doing it, sometimes to the point of addiction. Or it is convenient distraction during a period of boredom.

Most often a time sink takes all your attention, meaning you can't do anything else meaningful at the same time.

Entrepreneurs target time sink behavior change at their own peril. The nature of the time sink is that it is a highly competitive environment. You are going up against highly entrenched behaviors that are extremely difficult to change. Can your own endeavor compete against Netflix?

Also remember, you are competing against so many other entrepreneurs. Your own time sink might just be a flash in the pan, dethroned by somebody that is more fashionable.

So entrepreneurs really really have to thing twice about endeavors in this space. It is absolutely rife with failure. If you do compete in this domain, your emotional drivers for change need to be extremely high and stable over a long period of time.

Time source behavior change

Time source behavior change involves creating more time for consumers. Examples include businesses like home cleaning, home shopping, online shopping, and other services of convenience.

Those entrepreneurs who give consumer an additional “source” of time, are often richly rewarded, because these consumers have money to spend in exchange for time. Some have way more money than time, so you can build quite a profitable business here. Unfortunately and depressingly, the time saved is often plowed back into time sinks, but who are we to criticize.

Time source behavior change is driven by inconvenience and sometimes hate. If you don't like house cleaning or shopping, get somebody else to do it, if you have money, of course.

Identifying opportunities in this space is as simple as asking two questions. What don't you like to do? Do you have money to spend on it?

Since it is so simple for the entrepreneur to identify opportunities in this space, it is also a highly competitive space where most of the niches have been filled, and it is often a race to the bottom most of the time.

People like to get a lot of time for little money. There is always someone trying to offer time cheaper and more efficient. Since a lot of the cost of an offering is because of labor cost, this area is always chasing automation. Technology plays a huge role in time source behavior change.

Examples are online market places, where consumer and producer are connecting with each other efficiently, and the platform takes a cut of the transaction value. Behind the scenes, a reverse auction determines the cheapest labor worldwide (service providers bid to offer you extra time in your day) and optimizes value.

More recently, the development of artificial intelligence (AI) grabbed the attention of entrepreneurs all over the world. By removing humans from the cost equation via AI, essentially time can be sourced much cheaper.

We really don't know where the automation trend will end. It may be a very destructive path for humans overall. In the race for a better deal on sourcing time, we might be shooting ourselves in the foot.

As an entrepreneur, if you can source time cheaper than anyone else, you should consider it. Just be aware that you will most likely be chased by others sooner rather than later.

Time stacking behavior change

Time sink and time sources are a nice complement of each other. One feeds the other. But there are other interesting forms of behavior change that entrepreneurs can experiment with, and one of the most interesting is time stacking behavior change. It has a lot of interesting business opportunities too.

At a given time, a consumer might be doing two or more things at the same time. There are interesting relationships and constraints when it comes to “time stacking”.

An obvious constraint is that you can't do some things together, for example, watching Netflix and driving a car is not compatible. This is because both tasks are mindful, and requires your attention.

But some activities don't require much attention, and can essentially be performed in a mindless way. Driving a car is pretty much mindless for most folks – you can think about other things or talk on the phone, without much danger. You are essentially using separate parts of your brain. Just like you can knit while watching TV.

Entrepreneurs use time stacking behavior change all the time.

Starbucks is a good example. Their core business is selling you a coffee, but they stack it with several other activities. The most obvious being as a space for customer to work – remote workers might prefer camping at Starbucks for the social feeling, rather than work from home. Starbucks is competing against offices and expensive co-working spaces by providing a free place to work, in exchange for a cup of coffee. They accomplish this by having tables and Wifi. If they they remove either, they would lose a lot of business.

Starbucks also creates social spaces. If you've hung around one during the day, you often see small groups of retirees chatting. They have comfy chairs for this.

There are lots of other stacking examples. McDonald's sometimes offer play spaces for kids, giving the parents a bit of peace, and saving on baby sitters.

Each layer in the stack typically involves either an essential or necessity, or caters to an emotion. Restaurants, hotels and other service businesses use stacking extensively. Its starts with a location, a mood, various services, price and the like. There is typically something essential (food or a bed), and then layers and layers of interesting things that cater to your emotions. The idea is if another layer is added, it could influence the behavior of consumers. For example, if a gym adds day-care, it might attract more stay-at-home parents.

Shopping malls essentially stack a lot of business stacks together, a sort of a super stacking. No wonder they are so popular, and why free-standing stores have such a hard time to compete.

In technical products, stacking results in more and more product features. However, it often leads to over complex products, and can lower adoption rates. So stacking lots of things with the hope of changing user behavior, does not always work. It can get confusing. Essentially, you can't be everything to everyone.

Creating a unique product offering via stacking behavior changes is rich with possibilities for entrepreneurs. You can simply stack together things involving positive things that people love, or you can attempt to improve things that people hate with things that people love or need.

It is all about the emotions when you stack behavior changes together. Lets look at some examples.

There is nothing worse than a soul killing commute in your car. You can spend hours a day in traffic. Not only does it take a lot of time, it is expensive and dangerous too. So commuting involves a highly negative emotion, and so entrepreneurs naturally spent a lot of effort changing behavior here. Some of “products” here include radio, car-pooling, car-pool lanes, buses, public transport, private transport networks, remote-working, co-working spaces, online conferencing, self-driving cars, electric cars, ride-sharing, car-sharing, navigation systems, car insurance, parking garages, valet, baby seats, crossing guards, and probably a hundred other things, and more to be discovered by future entrepreneurs.

Simply moving a person from A to B causes massive behavior changes and created a lot of products made by creative entrepreneurs. What they did is to stack some behavior changes on the simple physical rule that you can't be in two places at the same time.

And as we can see, often the stacking happens on top of someone else's business when that business does not address consumer emotions adequately.

There are lots of stacking behavior changes happening in other areas where humans spend a lot of time, for example working and earning a living. There are a lot of heavy emotions involved in the job market, so there are zillions of opportunities for entrepreneurs.

Just pick something that consumers either love or hate, constrained by a particular activity, and find a way to stack something on top of it, and you probably hit a business.

Needless to say, this is a rich area for entrepreneurs to explore, and is likely to bring you success.

Time neutral behavior change

Time neutral behavior change is when an entrepreneur changes behavior but it does not affect time spent of a person. This the opposite behavior change from none of the classes above.

Examples include investing, donating to charity, supporting social causes, insurance, and the like.

Time neutral behavior changes often involves a momentary decisions to initiate something which then is pretty much on auto-pilot and can practically be forgotten. You for example decide to save money in our retirement plan, and then pay attention to it again when you retire. Or you give a donation to charity. Or you write a letter to complain about something.

Since this event is just a blip on the radar of your life, it is easily ignored or postponed. You can basically do without it most of the time, and often not much emotion is associated with it. Hence it is hard for an entrepreneur to affect behavior change, exactly due to the lack of emotion.

So one way affect change here is to whip up very strong emotions, be it anger or fear. For example, the fear of being destitute in your retirement, or of an expensive accident, or being angry about something close to your heart, like animal cruelty or saving the planet.

This is a hard area for an entrepreneur to change behavior in. There are many other endeavors that try to get you to do the one thing that they want you to do. And they all pull heavily on the emotions.

But if you can pull it off, you might have a client for life. The best example being insurance.

OK, so how does all of this help with the concept of idea engineering? Do we have any more of a process?

Well the most obvious conclusion is that some things are easier than others for an entrepreneur to find success in. And that given a choice, you should be aware that some paths will be easier than others.

Also, that emotion plays a massive role in changing the behavior of people.

No emotion. No behavior change. No business.

And if you are a technical founder, be aware that technology plays a supporting role. It is probably the least important thing. Please don't start with the clever technology and then try to pick your idea.

Always start with thinking about behavior change.

Good luck and prosper, entrepreneur!

An entrepreneur is someone who changes the behavior of people.

The great thing about this definition is that it allows for entrepreneurship completely divorced from the organization structure (typically a company), motive (deriving profit, social good, fun, etc), or scale (from a few people to the whole of humanity).

Of course, the most common configuration is a for-profit startup targeting a niche market.

But many configurations are possible.

An eco-entrepreneur might employ a global structure consisting of many individuals and organizations with a for-profit motive, and the purpose of saving the planet (humanity scale).

Notice that the definition does not include a definition of “goodness”. Clearly, some entrepreneurs might have an evil intention, but it seems unlikely that it would scale, so we don't need to include it in the definition.

Facebook clearly changed the behavior of pretty much all of humanity, but many people argue not in a good way. When you get to the humanity scale, all sorts of unintended effects are to be expected. You might start out good but end up evil.

Notice that the definition does not mention how behavior change is accomplished. No technology is mentioned.

In fact, at the risk of upsetting a lot of techies, I am afraid that technology is most likely NOT the reason why behavior change.

The entrepreneur deals with people and behavior. He understands how it all fits together.

The strategy of educating a person, and expecting their behavior to change, most often does not work. For example, most people believe in climate change, but their behavior do not change. The penguins are dying, everyone knows, few care.

So what causes behavior change?

Feelings. Emotions.

When you feel nothing, nothing happens. No change. Because this is how the human brain is wired up.

The savvy entrepreneur knows this. She thinks how to connect with people on an emotional level. In contrast, the technical entrepreneur starts with the technology and then tries to find a purpose for it – which is really the wrong way around.

OK, having set the stage appropriately, lets invent a business to illustrate how it all works.

Lets say we would like to save the penguins, we want to make a profit, and we want to do it at the humanity scale.

Lets call our company Save-the-Penguins, because I can't think of a more appropriate name right now.

For this to have the maximum emotional impact, I am afraid we will have to do things a bit different. So steel yourself.

Our company, based in Antarctica, will KILL ONE PENGUIN EVERY DAY.

Yes, chop off its head. Chop-chop.

The event will be broadcast daily, live, on YouTube.

The outrage about our efforts will be tremendous. Yes, emotions will run high. The publicity will be absolutely crazy. Kids will be crying tonight. There will be death threats.

We will be the most evil company in the world.

This is what we want.

There will be a fallout. We will be banned from Youtube in 48 hours, but the chopping will continue indefinitely.

However ... there is a simple out for humanity.

If on a given day, we receive $100K in donations, the penguin of the next day will be saved. No chop-chop. Lucky penguin.

If we don't meet our target for two days, two penguins will be killed. Three days, three penguins, etc.

We take monthly donations, and you get a poster. Our profit is 10% of the revenue to run the operations and keep the lawyers paid.

The rest of the income is donated to the cause of saving the penguins. Our estimated revenue is around $36M per year. We expect to save millions of penguins every year. Our business plans include expanding to other “verticals” – pretty much all endangered animals.

If humanity does not care, penguins will die. It is your choice.

You want your kids to sleep tonight, right?

We are the entrepreneurs of the future, saving the planet one penguin at a time.

I am looking for a new job. I am fortunate that there are both an abundance of jobs around me, and that there is interest in my skills, however eclectic. The bunch of keywords on my resume seem to be working well, and very nice recruiters are bringing me all sorts of leads.

Like shopping for breakfast cereal, I have to make a decision what to do next, based on a huge selection where I am not sure what is inside the box is going to be any good or not.

So I am thinking a lot about what this new job should be like. Now I should admit that there is no real rush to make a decision, so the situation probably does not translate to many other folks. I now have the luxury to dream what I can do next, at least until a panic sets in.

I can do whatever I do the very best, and have done many times before. It involves sitting in front of a computer for many months.

I not am happy with those terms any more. I want to negotiate the terms of my future commitments and contentment.

The notion of me being a person that can just do X is totally stupid. I can learn other things, and have done so many times in the past. This is nothing strange to me, but it seems to be a obstacle in the thinking of others. I see all these job postings with incredibly detailed requirements. Stuff most people have never heard of before. The companies are all asking for somebody very specific, instead of asking for somebody that can learn anything.

At first I was intimidated, and rejected companies based on their requirements. Yeah, I pretty much end up rejecting myself before they even talked to me.

I now find it very silly.

I adopted a strategy where I apply to companies that I think have a purpose, and I might like. I now ignore the job requirements. I apply to jobs in areas I know nothing about.

This of course can create confusion. Some folks cannot think out of their little box, so I get spurned, but I am thinking: that was a close call, not much imagination there.

Other folks seem to take this in their stride. They say, oh OK, I see you might be able to do something else for me. Typically not an open position they have. I am thinking: great coincidence, this might just work out.

I am not sure they always believe me when I say I can learn whatever esoteric technology they want to use. But I stick to my guns. If I don't know something, I just tell them so.

I keep on giving more requirements to the recruiters. They take it in their stride. I guess they tell this to their companies too, but who knows.

I give some pretty direct feedback to some of the companies I talk to. Like this is likely not going to work for you. Or your business model sucks. When they take it in their stride, I think, yeah, this might be interesting. When it blows up, I think, close call.

I ask a lot of question. I interview them. I ask for things I think they would probably not agree too, but if they did, it would be really great thing.

I am setting my terms.

Innovation powers the modern world. You can argue whether that is good or bad, but if you are interested in how innovation actually works, it becomes quite murky quickly.

We can easily see how something is innovative, but how did it actually happen? Who are the people behind the innovation, and how did they do it?

The American culture of innovation subscribes to the existence of a hero. You likely heard the names of Edison, Einstein, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Steve Jobs in this context. These are the guys that somehow, through some unique “brain quirk”, came up with something really useful and valuable to humanity.

(I pause for criticism.)

OK, so if we want an innovation, we need an innovator. A good one. Where do we find one?

This is of course question a lot of companies ask themselves, and are often willing to spend a lot of money on, especially if they are large and looking for more revenue streams, cool new products, and mind share.

Now finding an innovator to do your bidding (hey you, start innovating for me!) is a really major problem.

The truth is that good innovators are not easy to find. There are simply not that many. You are probably talking about a very very small fraction of a percent of the world population. There are some attempts to identify innovators, and the 30 under 30 type lists immediately spring to mind.

OK, so your company search for an innovator “just for you” is likely going to turn up short very fast.

The reality is that most innovators are innovating already, and probably doing it quite successful all by themselves, without you bringing your own demands into the equation.

Basically, innovators are not interested in your company.

OK, so now what?

Well, you can lower your standards. Maybe you don't need a Steve Jobs, just someone from the second or maybe third tiers of innovators, that is willing to do your bidding.

Sounds doable, right?

Well first you will need a way to identify these innovators. What criteria should you look for?

I think most would agree that innovators need to know a lot of stuff. Knowing a lot of stuff means somebody that has learned a lot of stuff, and done a lot of things themselves. They keep up with the latest stuff by reading.

Actually, if you dig deeper behind the “established” innovators, you will find that they are all life long learners, and spend an extra-ordinary amount of time reading.

Often reading all sorts of topics they are interested in. Essentially it means more than just reading the New York times every day.

I think you would also agree that your personal innovator will have to spend a lot of time thinking. The idea has to come from somewhere, right?

Good so far. We need somebody that always learns and also thinks a lot.

Of course, your personal innovator will need to think about things that are relevant to you and your business. So the best is to have someone that knows your business, and so the innovator will probably need to spend a lot of time talking to folks in your business. To get the lay of the land, so to say.

OK, we are getting there. We need an avid reader, thinker and talker.

What else?

Oh, the innovator should be able to “sell” the idea to management! Should be pretty convincing and solid presenter, otherwise no-one is going to do any of it. Come to think of it, the innovator better be really good at that, because my company is pretty old-fashioned and new ideas typically get shot down. So the person probably needs to have a thick skin.

So now we have reader, thinker, talker, presenter, and sales person.

Probably an older person with some gravitas, I would say. Oh, it seems I forgot to add experience. Not too controversial either, because we don't want more crazy people, come to think of it.

Right!

Reader, thinker, talker, presenter, sales person, gravitas, older, experienced, and relatively normal.

Anything else?

Best be able to take some direction from others, since a person like this can go onto all sorts of tangents that could be very disruptive. And I could look bad if that person is mucking things up for everyone, or heaven forbid screws up the quarterly report.

Reader, thinker, talker, presenter, sales person, gravitas, older, experienced, relatively normal, and a follower.

(Pause.)

We can go on and on like this. We can think of all sorts of criteria for the job. Everyone has an idea what this person should be.

Good luck writing the job description.

Your personal innovator is like Robocop that got programmed with all sorts of contradictory sh*t at the factory and then goes berserk when helping an old lady across the street.

HR will laugh at you.

But lets be optimistic. You finally found your guy or gal!

Now your innovator sits in the corner office just thinking and talking, and doing stuff that nobody knows about, and everyone is really getting pissed off that this guy is actually paid to do that. He is just reading blogs and stuff. Sometimes just stares at the ceiling a really long time. Its been going on like that for 3 months now!

Who the hell came up with the idea to be innovative in the first place?

Enter your email to subscribe to updates.